May 20, 2006

St. Ambrose plan to house scab labor draws fire.

From the Q.C. Times:
St. Ambrose University has been “besieged with calls” this week about its agreement to provide housing for Alcoa’s salaried replacement workers in the event of a union strike, the school’s president said.

And he wants people to know the university is listening.

St. Ambrose President Ed Rogalski said Thursday that the Davenport school is trying to reach out again to Alcoa’s Steelworkers union and others, hoping to heal the rift between them about St. Ambrose’s recent decision to partner with Alcoa.

“We’re listening to the concerns that are being expressed and we’re weighing all these matters thoughtfully,” he said.

The agreement gives Alcoa access to about 150 vacant dormitory rooms, with space to house about 300 salaried workers — visiting from other Alcoa plants — who would replace union workers if they strike at the Davenport Works plant in Riverdale, Rogalski said.

Negotiations for a new labor agreement between Alcoa Inc. and the United Steelworkers got under way Thurday in St. Louis. The current labor agreement, which covers 9,000 employees at 15 Alcoa plants, is set to expire May 31.

Alcoa will rent the rooms at a rate “below what they’d be paying for retail,” Rogalski said.

The situation has upset not only some union members but also various St. Ambrose alumni members, who say the idea goes against Catholic social justice teachings that support the fundamental rights of workers to join unions and seek decent wages.

The college, as far as I’m concerned, is choosing sides,” said Jerry Messer, president of the Quad-City Federation of Labor, adding that his phone has been ringing off the hook about the matter. “It’s against everything they believe in. This is nothing but greed.”

Messer said union members most likely will picket St. Ambrose, if Alcoa’s replacement workers are housed there. He said it doesn’t matter to him that the workers would be Alcoa employees from other sites.

“They’re still scabs,” he said. “When you’re replacing a worker on strike, they’re scabs.”

The deal came after Jerry Kavanaugh, a liaison between St. Ambrose and Quad-City union building trades workers, contacted Rory Washburn from the Tri-Cities Building Trades Council and Skip McGill from the Steelworkers, Kavanaugh said.

McGill said he is staunchly against the agreement, but Washburn said building trades workers will continue construction work on St. Ambrose’s campus, regardless.

“We support the Steelworkers, but we’ve got an agreement at that particular site,” Washburn said. “The construction work up there has been 100 percent union, so we’re going to support him through the endeavor. We do support the Steelworkers, too.”
The article also notes that a QC lodging association is upset at not getting some of the business to house the scabs.


At 5/20/2006 6:45 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

These are not scabs. These are current salaried employees of Alcoa who have been assigned, told what to do. A salaried employee who wishes to honor the picket line will lose their job. They have no choice or say in the matter, just like the men and women of the union who are caught in the middle between the two parties. When the elephants fight, it is the grass that gets hurt, and that is exactly what will happen to rank and file at Alcoa, both at the salaried end and in the bargainingunit. A strike is a no win situation for everyone. Let's hope this does not materialize.

At 5/20/2006 11:25 AM, Blogger The Inside Dope said...

While your point is well taken, and these "replacement workers" may have little choice but to do this or get canned, the fact of the matter, as unfortunate as it may be, is that they are scab labor, pure and simple.

Scabs without much choice in the matter, but scabs nonetheless.

As the union official says, anytime you replace striking workers, you're a scab.

It doesn't matter what the circumstances are.

It may be understandable why these people choose to be scabs, but they are still scabs. Even if they're put over a barrel by Alcoa.

And then there's the issue of a university associated with the Catholic church housing these people.

At 5/23/2006 3:07 PM, Blogger diehard said...

I just think it's interesting that someone like Rogalski, who I'm sure professes to be a Christian and I'm sure votes Republican using ofcourse abortion as an excuse is so quick to s--t on his fellow man!
But I was proud of my ol religion , The Catholic Church sticking up for the rights of workers!
It makes me want to go back to church!

At 5/24/2006 1:02 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am very sure Rogalski regrets that nice dinner or lunch where he and his buddy Wilkerson made such a handshake deal....

You'd think those two guys would know that the whole idea stinks worse than horse dung!!

It was kinda like the Isabel Bloom deal that went sour. Sometimes you have to hit them over the head with it.

Why was Rory Washburn so supportive of this anyway? Is the fact he lives in Iowa making him a "right to work guy" now??


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home