October 29, 2006

Jaw-dropping, utterly shameless Republican hypocrisy. Wait, is that even news anymore?

More news about God's Own Party.

This from Josh Micah Marshall's TPM is interesting.

A pity that this will likely never be picked up by the mainstream press. No one but you and a few hundred thousand others will likely ever know.

A gay prostitute with about 12 hours of journalistic experience from a ficticious press organization allowed into White House press conferences dozens of times under an alias to ask Bush softball questions.

Mark Foley hitting on teen-aged boys and Republican leadership knowing about it and doing nothing about it at all.

A "gay network" among Republican hill staffers.

All kinds of homoerotic torture scenes enacted in Iraq and Gitmo at the direction of the administration.

The head of the RNC widely accepted to be gay himself.

Karl Rove's adoptive father was openly gay in the later years of his life.

And a Republican party obsessed with scareing the gullible with the threat of a "gay agenda" which would destroy the very country itself and which threatens to (somehow) eliminate straight marriage completely. And a Republican party which has squandered untold millions and vital national attention at the expense of other issues crying out for attention on trying to control what gay people do in their private lives and preventing them from being just as miserable as married straights.

And some people still think that the evangelicals haven't been used like rented mules by this party to achieve and hold power? Useful idiots, I believe Stalin referred to groups like this as.

Suckers.

2 Comments:

At 11/03/2006 6:52 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What is it about liberals...you want to kill babies on demand and canonize every gay person.

Jeez, seemed like life was a whole lot easier 50-years ago when we allowed babies to live and left gay's alone.

 
At 11/03/2006 7:46 AM, Blogger The Inside Dope said...

What is it about conservatives and reality?

Can't you get by with the truth?

First of all, you can NOT utter an arguement without spouting some way-out preposterous lie. This time it's your first sentence, a lie from start to finish.

Secondly, 50 years ago, there were abortions going on by the thousands, only women would often die in the process and were forced to be shipped to dingy back-ally abortion parlors. You'd rather go back to that, eh? Bet your daughter or grandaughter might have a difference of opinion.

And you're nuts if you think we "left gays alone" 50 years ago.

Your history, your facts, and your entire version of reality doesn't have any resemblance to either.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home