September 8, 2006

Editor's note

I had a post up for a short while which reported some scuttlebutt regarding the Hare campaign that was sent to me by a source I consider both credible and reliable. But they were reporting something they'd heard from yet another source.

Although I trusted the source who sent it and have confidence that it was on the level, the fact remained that it was not only unverified, but second hand as well, and that's not quite up to the standard I try to maintain.

In light of that, I took it down.

Sorry for any confusion.


Links to this post:

<< Home