Rock River, wetlands, take a big hit for "jobs".
Illinois (and the country) is faced with the dramatic destruction of wetlands, with only a fraction of it left and dwindling fast. These wetlands are a crucial environment for many species, as well as essential for flood prevention and serve several other critical functions as well.
But to many, they're just empty land to make a mint on.
Here's a shot sent in by a reader showing at least partially the site of the Triumph Hog Slaughter operation.
And here's a map showing the area shown by the photo.
As you can clearly see, it's right on top of wetlands, adjoins actual lakes, and is within a stone's throw from the Rock River itself.
Don't know about you, but even if you're all gung-ho for this plant, would you ever swim or fish in the Rock again after it's up and killing literally thousands of hogs per day? Is that the price you're willing to pay?
The potential for substantial pollution and degradation over time is large and real. Since you may not use or enjoy the Rock River yourself, are you willing to essentially degrade it, or at least the 20 or so miles below this plant and turn it into a gigantic waste disposal pipe into the Mississippi, in the name of "jobs"? And give up literally millions in tax revenue for the privilege?
This reader also sent in reams and reams of data, charts, statistics, and endless columns and quotes, no doubt legitimate, but unfortunately, not much of it was linked or sourced.
Much of it showed the effects of just such plants on other locales and the surrounding environment, in particular one disasterous plant in Milan, Missouri.
It also cited statistics and data showing how such plants attract huge number of CAFOs, or concentrated animal farming operations, which are notorious polluters, often creating entire large lakes full of disease ridden and barely treated hog waste.
3 Comments:
Dook, I wish I had reason to share your amazing confidence in the ability and desire of the EPA to enforce anything when it conflicts with a large economic interest with parties both in the corporation and in politics who are strongly motivated to make sure that they DON'T find violations, and if so, that they are quiety dealt with by paying a few minor fines.
I've read or heard nothing to suggest that the EPA, most particularly under this administration, is anything much more than a paper tiger.
Anon,
"Try to get on board" with what? Hundreds of thousands of gallons of hog waste? Thanks but no thanks. Can't get on board with that.
Feeding Asian carp pig sh*t? I thought the idea was to get rid of them, not provide a smorgasbord for them. What are you saying? That Asian carp are a good thing? It makes no sense to me.
I've tried to "get on board" with this, but I'm afraid trying to suggest that enormous invasive carp will eat the bacteria and disease ridden polution released into the water table and river just doesn't quite do the trick. Forgive me.
Give me a reason, besides some jobs, that I should "get on board".
Rope, old pal,
I can still enjoy a good pork chop or a rack of smoked back ribs without a huge slaughter plant being located right next to a local river while destroying acres of already vanishing wetlands.
Are you arguing that if this plant didn't locate in that exact spot that pork chops will disappear?
Surely not.
And yep, this is the midwest alright. And the midwest is a pretty damn big place. A whole lot of places for a hog slaughter factory and the concentrated hog lots that it will attact to locate.
Let them go foul someone else's area. Someplace where people don't give a damn about the environment that they live in and who are so desperate and uninformed that they'll agree to anything if it dangles the prospects of some jobs.
Oh yeah. I guess that's here.
Post a Comment
<< Home