November 6, 2005

Sen. Jacobs disputes account of Rosa Parks story.

After learning of the negative reaction to the story in the Dispatch/Argus (which I quoted in an earlier post), it's reported that Sen. Jacobs went to Dispatch/Argus reporter Scott Reeder's office in Springfield and angrily chewed him out.

The Dispatch today responds with a transcript of only the portion of Jacobs' remarks which reference Rosa Parks. They offer no apology or opinion, and seem to be letting the reader be the judge as to whether Jacobs has grounds for feeling mistreated.
Sen. Mike Jacobs, D-East Moline, took issue Friday with how a story in The Dispatch and The Rock Island Argus reported comments he made comparing Rosa Parks' stand against inequality with his stand against House Speaker Michael Madigan on riverboat gambling.

"I was simply drawing an analogy," Sen. Jacobs said, between Ms. Parks' refusal in 1955 to give up her bus seat to "a person of power" and the fight against a bill recently passed by the House with Mr. Madigan's support that would ban riverboat gambling.

The comments came at a news conference Thursday in the capitol press room in Springfield. Here, from a radio station's audiotape, are the senator's recorded comments referencing Ms. Parks at the beginning of his remarks, at the end, and during a question-and-answer period:

-- "Rosa Parks was the mother of the civil rights movement, and she was one of the most important citizens of the 20th Century. Parks, a seamstress from Montgomery , Ala., refused to give up her seat to a person of power. Like Rosa, my community refuses to ride in the back of the bus."

-- "Like a determined Rosa Parks, I, and the members that surround me today, refuse to ride in the back of the bus. We will stand up and we will fight."

-- "The fact is that it is very difficult to stand up for yourself here (in the legislature). Not many people do it. I point out that I've been here six months. I'm standing up today telling the Illinois speaker that, yeah, you run the Illinois House, but you know what, you don't run the Illinois Senate. And, you know, I take great pride in someone like Rosa Parks who had courage to stand up for her convictions. Even if she felt she was wrong or right."

Ms. Parks died last week at age 92.

The audio feed included Sen. Jacobs' comments against any plan to remove riverboat gaming. He called the House measure "a wrong-headed bill that will drive 12 million riverboat patrons to other gaming areas," and he said the legislature should tackle "real problems" such as the budget deficit, the weak economy, children's health care and "our starving education system."
The Dispatch article from yesterday said,
"In his quest to protect riverboat gambling in Illinois, Sen. Mike Jacobs has taken to comparing himself to civil rights icon Rosa Parks.

Jacobs said the comparison is fair.

He noted he has been a senator for only six months and is standing up to powerful House Speaker Michael Madigan, much as Parks stood up for her beliefs."
and then went on to quote other's reaction to Jacobs' comments.

Is that unfair? Did that distort what Jacobs said?

Jacobs says he was drawing an analogy, the Dispatch said he was making a comparison. Isn't that essentially the same thing?

You be the judge. I have my opinion, what's yours?

5 Comments:

At 11/05/2005 6:18 PM, Blogger The Inside Dope said...

I think that assessment may prove to be too harsh, but here's the Merriam-Webster defs for the two dueling descriptions:

ANALOGY
1.inference that if two or more things agree with one another in some respects they will prob. agree in others
2 a : resemblance in some particulars between things otherwise unlike : SIMILARITY b : comparison based on such resemblance
3 : correspondence between the members of pairs or sets of linguistic forms that serves as a basis for the creation of another form
4 : correspondence in function between anatomical parts of different structure and origin -- compare HOMOLOGY
synonym see LIKENESS

COMPARE
1 : to represent as similar : LIKEN (shall I compare thee to a summer's day? -- Shakespeare)
2 a : to examine the character or qualities of especially in order to discover resemblances or differences (compare your responses with the answers) b : to view in relation to (tall compared to me)

 
At 11/05/2005 8:09 PM, Blogger Dave Barrett said...

It is hard to imagine how a politician can be effective if he/she does not have a firm grasp of reality or greatly misjudges how the public will react to his/her statements and actions.
If Mike Jacobs thinks that his stand supporting the gambling industry against a symbolic challenge by the Illinois House leadership which has no chance of becoming law is in any way analogous or comparable to Rosa Parks standing up to the system of Jim Crow laws by refusing to go to the back of the bus he is amazingly out of touch with how most Americans would view these two situations.
It does not bode well for his future as a politician.

 
At 11/06/2005 3:20 AM, Blogger The Inside Dope said...

Thanks for that Shama, though no one is debating the casino move.

I think the key to this all may lie within the second definition of the word "Analogy":

2 a : resemblance in some particulars between things otherwise unlike : SIMILARITY b : comparison based on such resemblance

In that respect, Jacobs committed no sin. He was merely "alluding" to how Rosa Parks's actions and the position he currently is in bear a "resemblance in some particulars between things otherwise unlike."

It would be hard to assert that Jacobs considers himself on the same moral level as Ms. Parks, but the fact remains that in hindsight, it was an unfortunate and artless analogy.

I think he got clobbered for simply bringing the name of Rosa Parks into it at all. I'm sure he now wishes he hadn't.

 
At 11/06/2005 12:15 PM, Blogger Dave Barrett said...

shamalamadingdong21,
You seem to be implying that the gambling bill just passed by the Illinois House and opposed by Senator Jacobs somehow threatens the existence of the Casino Rock Island or its planned move. The news media is giving the impression that the dispute is just Mike Madigan trying to force the gambiling industry to share its profits a little more with the people of Illinois. Has the news media mislead us? Is Mike Madigan really trying to shut down the gambling industry or scuttle the Casino Rock Ilsand's move? Could you explain that to us? If Mike Madigan is just trying to negotiate a slightly bigger slice of the profits for the people of Illinois then I don't understand how you can view Senator Jacob's opposition to him in such idealist terms. Instead of being a noble cause in the public interest it would be just the opposite. It would be Senator Jacobs serving the interests of the gambling industry at the public's expense -- perhaps in order to repay the gambling industry for its financial support.
You seem to have inside information about Senator Jacob's thinking on this. Could you enlighten us?

 
At 11/07/2005 8:22 AM, Blogger The Inside Dope said...

Dave, excellent question... as usual.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home