Well? Who wins and by how much? Get your predictions in by game time.
February 5, 2006
16 comments:
Don't be stupid. Really, don't be stupid.
Stop. Reread your comment. Does it make sense?
Are you making something up out of thin air in order to attack me with it? Reading something into a post that's clearly not there or even implied?
Then don't bother posting. For that matter, if that's the case, don't bother coming back.
Seattle by 3
ReplyDeletePittsburgh 31
ReplyDeleteSeattle 21
Seahawks up 3-0.
ReplyDeleteNow... if only no one scores for the rest of the game..... haha
The officiating was abyssmal and literally cost Seattle the game.
ReplyDeleteStraight calls and they would have won. Tsk tsk.
You seem to know as much about football as you do politics. Zip, zilch, nanda, nothing!
ReplyDeleteHow long did it take you to come up with that one, Chester?
ReplyDeleteI knew some nit-wit would come up with that before I even wrote my predicition.
I've never maintained that I'm a political genius, but I will say that I've never compared myself with a civil-rights icon days from her death for my stance defending gambling interests and I've never used thousands of dollars of campaign donations for massage services. Hell, I'd never even think of telling property owners concerned about a massive hog slaughtering plant moving in next to them essentially, tough luck, I'd never buy a house out in the country, and then suggest that anyone who lives out there pretty much should expect huge industrial plants to drive their property values into the dirt.
I may not be too smart, but I'm smarter than that.
But I'm getting used to the little ankle-biters. They're kind of cute, and if they get too annoying, you can always just squish 'em like bugs.
And how about those Stones, eh?
ReplyDeleteWhat a fiasco that was.
The Super Bowl is exhibit A in American consumerism run amok.
The hype has long ago outrun the event, therefore it's routinely an enormous disappointment to millions.
interesting theory indeed. If you believed in such things, the officiating sure fits the theory.
ReplyDeleteWow Doper! I never dreamed that your anger would get you in deeper trouble than you are already in. Your big mouth of yours never ceases to amaze me. Click!!! Your foolish words are the icing on the cake for my liable suit that will bring you out into the light. Your hatred for women has probably been your downfall for some time. I pity you for jeopardizing all that you have worked for.
ReplyDeleteSee you in court.
Click!!!!
Yeah... can't wait for your "liable" suit. I'll keep an eye on my mail.
ReplyDeleteIt's baffling really. You're so goofy and vindictive even after all that soothing research.
When is Mike Jacobs going to come clean about his masseuse/researcher as listed in his financial disclosure form?
ReplyDeleteThe woman he lists as having paid two thousand big ones for "research" works at a local massage parlor!
Why is he refusing to explain just what "research" she did for two thousand cool ones?
The silence is deafening.
I gave to his campaign and I damn sure didn't give my hard earned money for him to spend on expensive massages and then lie about it.
He's not getting another dime from me.
Go here and look in the itemized expenditures
ReplyDeleteand then go to this page.
Amazing, huh?
No more money from me.
This is about Sports I thought? What is the deal here??
ReplyDeleteDope, you should pray they file suit. It would be the best thing that ever happened.
ReplyDeleteIt would get laughed out of court of course, but even if it got anywhere, the discovery process would be fantatic. Just think of all those business records to see where those expenditures actually went and what they'd reveal. Just think how utterly stupid the person which filed such a suit would look.
But with a track record of doing stupid and damaging mistakes already established, this would seem to be a natural way to make the stupidest one ever.
I am truly blessed by the stupidity of my enemies here.
ReplyDeleteOne dumbass wrote to say he'd pay for a lawsuit on behalf of "Ms. xxxxx" and actually named the masseuse in question. Something I've never done, by the way.
First of all, there's not a damn thing to base a lawsuit of any kind on, and secondly, these morons actually named this woman. If she sues anyone, it would be the neanderthal chowder-heads that put her name out in public.
What absolutely brain-dead jerks.
I'm just glad these people are so damn stupid. But sometimes, it's almost too easy.
I think that Mike Jacobs is wrong for hiring massuse from his campaign. We feel that this is a big issue. Rumler in a landslide!!
ReplyDelete